Customer Workflow Discovery
Getting close enough to a workflow to understand what people need to decide, route, review, or explain.
- Discovery through real examples
- Handoffs, edge cases, and review states
- Clear success criteria before automation
BACKGROUND
I like work where the real problem is hidden in handoffs: customer context spread across tools, engineering state that is hard to interpret, and AI output that needs to be useful without becoming opaque.
Getting close enough to a workflow to understand what people need to decide, route, review, or explain.
Building projects with the same boundaries I would want in production: typed contracts, tests, local fixtures, and deployable service shapes.
Using LLMs where they can compress investigation or drafting, while keeping source data, guardrails, and human judgment visible.
Designing screens that make operational state readable: what changed, why it matters, and what should happen next.
Make the real workflow visible. Good tools respect the steps people are already taking.
Build close to the problem. The first useful version should exercise real data shapes, integration points, and review paths.
Design for trust. People need to know what changed, why it changed, and where their judgment still matters.